Sunday, June 22, 2008

Congress Passes New FISA Bill, Weakens 4th Amendment

New Law Does Not Restore the Original 1978 FISA Principles

The Congress has handed the White House sweeping new powers in the new FISA Bill. Proponents of the Bill claim that it is a victory because the legislation prevents the White House from engaging in warrantless spying, by placing wiretapping activities back under the jurisdication and oversight of FISA courts. However, that is not actually what the Bill has done. The new law is actually a re-write of the original 1978 FISA law, which gave clear oversight to FISA Courts. The original law was much more stringent in terms of probable cause requirements, and had more provisions for protecting the rights of Americans. Under the original law, surveillance requests were reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

The new re-written FISA law does not require any detailed Court oversight. It would not prevent the White House from engaging in warrentless wiretapping in the future.

In a strange twist, Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pennsylvania, sparred with Pelosi over the extraordinary powers the Democrats’ bill grants to the White House, saying the legislation does not appear to prevent the White House from initiating surveillance without a court order.

“This proposal dodges" that, Specter said

This is at least the third time that the Democrats have caved on a major piece of legislation related to the fundamental rights of Americans. They are referring to their caving as a "compromise". But the only thing that they have compromised is the 4th Amendment of the Constitution. We may as well throw that amendment out of the window. Why not shred the entire Bill of Rights too? It has been decades since the Federal government has really honored the Constitution anyway.

From the Moderate Voice:

This is the same doublespeak we got from Nancy Pelosi. This — “Under this compromise legislation, an important tool in the fight against terrorism will continue, but the President’s illegal program of warrantless surveillance will be over. It restores FISA and existing criminal wiretap statutes as the exclusive means to conduct surveillance – making it clear that the President cannot circumvent the law and disregard the civil liberties of the American people.” — is technically true, but only because the bill changed FISA to give the president the powers he wants, minus the accountability he does not want. In other words, the House has enshrined the president’s entire illegal warrantless surveillance program in law, called it “FISA,” and now has the chutzpah to claim that the bill “restores FISA and existing criminal wiretap statutes as the exclusive means to conduct surveillance.”

Ironically, a Federal appeals Court ruled last week that employers could not spy on the e-mails and text messages of employees. Either we have two separate Constitutions, or the Congress is hoodwinking the American public once again.

I'm not soft on Terrorism. I believe that Intelligence agencies need provisions that will allow them to do their work. However, I believe such provisions should be reasonable. The 1978 FISA law was created as a tool for gathering intelligence. Yes, the original law was outdated and didn't allow enough flexibility. Fair enough. But it could have been adjusted to provide Law Enforcement and Intelligence agencies with the flexibility that they need. There was no real need to go outside of the law. What the new law has done is that it has legalized much of the illegal activity that the Bush administration engaged in with its warrantless wiretapping. The retroactive immunity is also a problem, however, the Telecom companies were often in an impossible position. The FBI's use of "National Security Letters" prevented the phone companies and e-mail providers from protesting or even discussing the surveillance requests with third parties.

Once again, there does not seem to be a balance of power in Washington. The White House still gets a rubber stamp from Congress.

See how members of Congress voted on this legislation.


Anonymous said...

Now, the FISA bill is getting ready to pass in the Senate. The problem with this is that if the bill passes in the Senate and then signed into law, Americans are not going to realize right away that their rights have been stripped of them. This is definitely a step in the wrong direction for this country.

Anonymous said...

Our site is following this closely as well.

Anonymous said...

I campaign for OBAMA during his primaries, from Georgia to California where I called my friends, relatives, neighbors, old college friends and even my ex-girlfriends to vote for him. I stayed all-night to see the elections overages and results. WHY -- I believed in him and respected him. I though he was different than others and a man of principal. Now I see I was fool, he is a just another democrats who does not have any backbone. It is beyond my believe and comprehension, how a constitutional law professor is ready to abandon or step on the 4TH amendment and help to cover what I believe the Federal crime done by the president of the United State. Yes I am referring to FISA. Why is he so eager to protect the telecommunication lobbyist? Shame on him and all the ……Democratic Party leaders. It was not long ago, his party, Senators Feinstein and Chuck Schumer who helped Michael B. Mukasey to become Attorney General. At least I know what to expect from republicans. As you said, “[w]e must be as careful getting out of Iraq as we were careless getting in” (barackobama, 2008), similarly we all must be careful how we vote this November as were careless getting involved with you false promises. This is the 1st time I will not vote in presidential election.

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry that should read