Showing posts with label Mortgage Crisis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mortgage Crisis. Show all posts

Friday, September 05, 2008

Government to take over Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae

Hat tip: DailyKos

This is SUCH a big deal.

Here is the NYTimes story:

U.S. Rescue Seen at Hand for 2 Mortgage Giants
By STEPHEN LABATON and ANDREW ROSS SORKIN
Published: September 5, 2008


WASHINGTON — Senior officials from the Bush administration and the Federal Reserve on Friday informed top executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage finance giants, that the government was preparing to seize the two companies and place them in a conservatorship, officials and company executives briefed on the discussions said.

The plan, effectively a government bailout, was outlined in separate meetings that the chief executives were summoned to attend on Friday at the office of the companies’ new regulator. The executives were told that, under the plan, they and their boards would be replaced, shareholders would be virtually wiped out, but the companies would be able to continue functioning with the government generally standing behind their debt, people briefed on the discussions said.

It is not possible to calculate the cost of any government bailout, but the huge potential liabilities of the companies could cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars and make any rescue among the largest in the nation’s history.

The drastic effort follows the bailout this year of Bear Stearns, the investment bank, as government officials continue to grapple with how to stem the credit crisis and housing crisis that have hobbled the economy. With Bear Stearns, the government provided guarantees and the bulk of its assets were transferred to JPMorgan Chase, leaving shareholders with a nominal amount.

Under a conservatorship, the remaining common and preferred shares of Fannie and Freddie would be worth little, and any losses on mortgages they own or guarantee could be paid by taxpayers. A conservatorship would operate much like a pre-packaged bankruptcy, similar to what smaller companies use to clean up their books and then emerge with stronger balance sheets.

The executives were told that the government had been planning to announce the decision as early as Sunday, before the Asian markets reopen, the officials said.

For months, administration officials have grappled with the steady erosion of the books of the two mortgage finance giants. A fierce behind the scenes debate among policy makers has considered whether to seize the companies or let them work out their problems.

But the declining housing and financial markets have apparently now forced the administration’s hand. With foreign governments growing increasingly skittish about holding billions of dollars in securities issued by the companies, no sign that their losses will abate any time soon, and the inability of the companies to raise new capital, the administration apparently decided it would be better to act now rather than closer to the presidential election in two months.

Just five weeks ago, President Bush signed a law to give the administration the authority to inject billions of dollars into the companies through investments or loans. In proposing the legislation, Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. said that he had no plan to provide loans or investments, and that merely giving the government the authority to backstop the companies would provide a strong shot of confidence to the markets. But the thin capital reserves that have kept the two companies afloat have continued to erode as the housing market has steadily declined and the number of foreclosures has soared.

As their problems have deepened — and the marketplace has come to expect some sort of government rescue — both companies have found it difficult to raise new capital to absorb future losses. In recent weeks, Mr. Paulson has been reaching out to foreign governments that hold billions of dollars of Fannie and Freddie securities to reassure them that the United States stands behind the companies.

In issuing their quarterly financial statements last month, the two companies reported huge losses and predicted that home prices would fall more than previously projected.

The debt securities the companies issue to finance their operations are widely owned by mutual funds, pension funds, foreign governments and big companies.

Officials said the participants at the meetings included Mr. Paulson, Ben S. Bernanke, the chairman of the Fed, and James Lockhart, the head of both the old and new agency that regulates the companies. The companies were represented by Daniel H. Mudd, the chief executive of Fannie Mae, and Richard F. Syron, chief executive of Freddie Mac. Also participating was H. Rodgin Cohen, the chairman of the law firm, Sullivan & Cromwell, who was representing Fannie.




Rest of story at link above.

The enormity of this cannot be overstated.

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

Obama's Black..ergo, he's got bad credit.

And therefore couldn't possibly have gotten the discount on his mortgage on his own merit, is the subtext of this article in the Washington Post.

To wit, Poblano from FiveThirtyEight.com takes them to task:



Irresponsible Journalism Alert


It took more than four months, but something finally beat out the Vicki Iseman story for its sheer chutzpah and utter irresponsibility.

The culprit is this piece from the Washington Post, which alleges that Barack Obama received a "discount" on his 30-year home mortgage when he purchased his house in Hyde Park in 2005. Obama's mortgage rate was 5.625 percent; the Washington Post cites databases stating that the average rate on comparable properties was 5.93 percent.


So Obama's rate was 30 basis points better than the average. However, the amount of the loan and the nature of the property are not the only factors that determine a mortgage rate. Another major consideration is the creditworthiness of the borrower. According to current rate quotes from myFICO.com, a borrower with very good credit can expect a mortgage rate about 30 basis points better than someone with pretty good credit, and a borrower with excellent credit can expect about a 50 basis point discount.



Unless the Washington Post has access to Obama's FICO score -- and unless it has rented an apartment to him, it probably doesn't -- it is missing a pretty important piece of information on what Obama's mortgage rate ought to have been. What was Obama's FICO score? I don't know, but considering that...



* Obama had just gotten a $2.27 million book deal from Random House -- about $1 million more than the value of the mortgage.
* The Obamas each had exceptionally secure jobs that paid them a combined annual salary of about $500,000 per year.
* The Obamas had just sold their condo, on which they had realized a $137,500 profit.
* The Obamas were prominent public figures whose political futures depended in part on maintaining a reputation for responsibility and trustworthiness.
* The Obamas are known to be relatively thrifty and have no credit card debt but substantial savings.




...I would think that the Obamas were exceptionally creditworthy. So indeed, Obama received a "discount" -- the same discount that any borrower in his position would have received.



And, yes, I apologize for being a little off-subject (and running three media-bashing pieces in a row), but one of the things that ties together my work over here and my work at Baseball Prospectus is that I want the media to be smarter and more accountable when they cite statistical information, be it mortgage rates or polling numbers or batting averages. This article was neither smart nor accountable. It's the equivalent of noting that Alex Rodriguez has a batting average 40 points better than the league average, and using that to infer that the umpires were biased in his favor.

Posted by Nate at 8:17 AM




I didn't like the initial story because I thought it was an attack on character with no 'there there'. The McCains don't pay taxes on one of their EIGHT properties, but this Obama piece is the kind of 'story' that the MSM would run with without any verification or intelligent analysis that Poblano put into it.

Saturday, December 08, 2007

Homeowners Get Little More Than "Hope" From Bush & Co.

In response to the mortgage crisis, Bush tells homeowners in trouble to call for "Hope". UNREAL! I couldn't believe what I was hearing when I was listening to the report over the radio about his "solution". But later that evening I listened a second time to the portion of his news conference where he discussed his plan. I had to make sure that I wasn't hearing things.

``The best you can do for your family is to call 1-800-995- HOPE,'' Bush said. ``That is 1-800-995-H-O-P-E".

And the above "Hope" line turned out the be the wrong number.
His puppet masters had to quickly correct the error.

John Edwards slammed the Bush Administrations' minimal plan to freeze interest rates for a few borrowers, saying that it did not go far enough. Many economists agree that the plan would only offer moderate relief to a small percentage of the borrowers who are at risk of losing their homes. See more information about who the plan covers and what it will do.

It's ironic that American borrowers are in over their heads and Bush is offering little to help them... Because he has been overextending the whole Country with too much borrowing. See Youtube videos here and here.
China and other foreign financial systems are holding more and more U.S. debt, giving other nations increased leverage over our economy. And the falling value of the U.S. dollar is increasing what we owe to other nations, and it is leading some Countries to consider switching to an alternative currency for their international business transactions.

Friday, August 31, 2007

Bush to Help Mortgage Holders in Crisis

Bush to Help Mortgage Holders in Crisis

From Politico.com

Bush unveils mortgage crisis first steps
By: Mike Allen
Aug 31, 2007 12:09 AM EST
Updated: August 31, 2007 01:50 PM EST

President Bush has unveiled his first detailed steps to intervene in the subprime mortgage crisis that threatens to throw hundreds of thousands of people out of their homes and send financial markets into a tailspin.

"We will deliver help and hope to American families who need it, we'll help guard against future problems in the housing sector, we'll reaffirm the vital place of homeownership in our nation," Bush said.

"The recent disturbances in the subprime mortgage industry are modest -- they're modest in relation to the size of our economy," Bush said. "But if your family is -- if your family's one of those having trouble making the monthly payments, this problem doesn't seem modest at all. I understand these concerns."

"The government's got a role to play, but it is limited," Bush said. "A federal bailout of lenders would only encourage a recurrence of the problem. It's not the government's job to bail out speculators or those who made the decision to buy a home they knew they could never afford. Yet there are many American homeowners who could get through this difficult time with a little flexibility from their lenders or a little help from their government."


Well, as they say usually, and ESPECIALLY with this group...

the devil's in the details.

And, I just don't trust him or anyone near him. Until I hear it from credible people that this is actually help for HOMEOWNERS, I'm not going to believe it.

Because, it would be the first time, EVER, in his Presidency, that Shrub has EVER helped ' the little man'.

So, I will reserve any congratulations until the details are revealed. The cynic would say that it will be a figleaf for the Homeowner, and the meat of anything he's proposing is going to 'the big guys'.

This has been his pattern. Let's see if it continues. And, if it actually does help 'the little guy', then I will know for sure that this mortgage crisis is indeed as bad as James Cramer wrote about in this week's New York Magazine.


Update: Bush reveals his plan, and not 24 hours, here's someone telling us that the plan isn't 'all that'.
Bush's plan for aiding homeowners is less than it appears