Friday, October 16, 2009

Interracial Couple Denied Marriage License In Louisiana

The Confederacy is still alive and well in the South, in Louisiana in particular.
It seems that one Justice of the Peace has a problem with interracial marriage.

By his own admission, this may not be the first couple who has had to deal with his discrimination.

From The AP

Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish, says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long.

''I'm not a racist. I just don't believe in mixing the races that way,'' Bardwell told the Associated Press on Thursday. ''I have piles and piles of black friends. They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom. I treat them just like everyone else.''

Bardwell said he asks everyone who calls about marriage if they are a mixed race couple. If they are, he does not marry them, he said.

Oh Thanks for letting us Blacks use your bathroom Keith.

''I'm not a racist. I just don't believe in mixing the races that way,''

Really?

And of course he had to throw in...."I have Black friends".

But the kicker is the fact that he asks everyone who calls him if they are a mixed race couple.

How is someone who is openly racist allowed to serve as a Justice of the Peace? And how many lives has he impacted?

Apparently the couple is in the process of pursuing legal action. See full report here.


Link for Huffpo

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Nobody believes this is 'bi-partisan'. Democrats OWN whatever happens in healthcare.




'Dem Mooslims R Comin' to Git Ya'

they really do need to stop. they are out of their f'in minds.

Confronting the Healthcare Industry Shills



Arr Matey! Pirate Party Making Waves in European Politics

This is an interesting story from the Personal Democracy Forum on the Swedish and German Pirate Party, anti-Establishment political parties primarily made up of young voters, who have experienced rapid growth in recent years. The Swedish Pirate Party experienced its first taste of success in June of this year when the Pirate Party earned its first seat in the European Parliament.

Key quote from the article:
The “pirates” connect with young people using cultural expressions of political rejection with a sense of humour and intelligent criticism. They have traded in the stone-throwing and barricades typical of the German anarchist or antifascist movements that used to fascinate a sector of the German critical youth for smiles, jokes and digital culture. Young agitators, for example, have followed Angela Merkel to all her meetings to applaud her by shouting “Yeaaah”. Without disturbing public order but putting themselves in the public eye through aesthetic parody, they have organised a voting “flash mob”, a carnivalesque movement organised and announced electronically via mobile phone and the internet that “followed” the candidate. As a result, they have become part of the electoral landscape and their mocking and joking presence has been echoed in the media. Even Angela Merkel herself, to her credit, has greeted them from the podium on more than one occasion (“My young Internet friends”). The “alternatives” know how to communicate.

But what is important in political terms is that a party that emerged from the web is achieving a political presence in Europe not only due to young people’s discontent with the politics of the traditional parties with regard to the internet, but also because of their discontent and indifference towards those traditional parties themselves as well as their politics. The fact that, for the first time, a “native” internet organisation especially committed to the most progressive aspects of the web reached the heights of parliamentary representation is a historic landmark that may be the path of the future.

In a time of increasing alienation and rage at the politics of the two major American political parties by American voters (and general public), it is interesting to see if a similar political phenomenon occurs in the US as the Pirate Parties of Europe in the near future.

Full story at the Personal Democracy Forum

I'm Now On Twitter

For some reason the widget isn't showing... But you can follow me here.

I'm a complete Twitter virgin... so I am still learning the language... all and all fairly simple so far.

I will have to work out the kinks later.

Right now... it's time to catch a few hours of sleep before my night class.

Serious As A Heart Attack: The Independents' Story

The following article was forwarded by Nancy Hanks of The Hankster. It was written by independent activist Jackie Salit. In it, Salit provides insight on the impact of the independent vote.

Personally, I think the story that Jackie outlines in this commentary below is a "sea-change" story that "big media" picked up on briefly in 2006 and again in 2008 (election fever) but is now somehow completely missing from today's analysis. More than 40% of the American electorate identify as independents. And that growth was produced in large part by the progressive wing of the independent movement. If you blink on this, you will miss the story.

Thanks!
Nancy


SERIOUS AS A HEART ATTACK: THE INDEPENDENTS’ STORY


By: Jackie Salit


When we finally get far enough down the road on health care reform, it will become clear that a driving force in the intensity of the fight was a heart attack. Not the medical kind. The political kind.

Independents swung decisively to Barack Obama in the 2008 presidential election. And it is this shift by independents – who repositioned themselves from center-right to center-left – that gave the Republican right the political equivalent of cardiac arrest.

In 1992, 19 million independents voted for Ross Perot. In 2008, 19 million independents voted for Barack Obama. Over the span of 15 years, the largely white, center-right independent movement re-aligned itself with Black America and progressive-minded voters.

This did not happen out of the blue. It did not happen by magic. It happened because the progressive wing of the independent movement did the painstaking and often controversial work of bringing the Perot movement and the Fulani movement together at the grassroots. The Fulani movement refers to the country’s leading African American independent, Dr. Lenora Fulani, who exposed the black community to independent politics and introduced the independent movement to an alliance with Black America.

No doubt the dramatics that the right wing brought to the Town Hall meetings this summer were intended for the television cameras. But the organizers, strategists and radio personalities who orchestrated the theatrics had a particular audience in mind: Independents. If they could tarnish Obama’s image with indies, they could damage the black and independent alliance and re-establish the Republican Party as an influential force amongst independents. Some of that could be accomplished, they felt, by claiming Obama’s health plan would drive up the national debt – a concern that animated the early Perot movement. Some Republican strategists felt that if they simply branded Obama a socialist, it would scare independents away – not from the health care plan (everyone recognizes a plan of some kind will get passed) but away from the center-left coalition that elected him.

If indies are feeling somewhat disillusioned with President Obama over the health care reform fight, it has more to do with fears that he is being overly influenced by the partisans in Congress. Since independents voted for him to be a more independent president, it’s easy to see how some felt disappointed by his handling of the Republican onslaught. Obama’s independent appeal was based on his challenge to the prevailing culture of Clintonian opportunism in the Democratic Party and partisanship inside the Beltway. Put another way, the independent vote for Obama was an effort to define a new kind of progressivism, one that was not synonymous with Democratic Party control.

After years of hard work and organizing, independents have become a sought-after partner in American politics. They elected President Obama and New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg, arguably the country’s two most independent and pragmatically progressive elected officials. No wonder the Republican Party right wants a clawback.

Independents are vulnerable to being peeled away by the Republican right. The Pew Research Center reports that were the 2010 midterms to be held today, independents would lean towards Republicans by a 43 to 38 percent margin. But, the evolution of a 21st century independent movement is not that simple. First, the movement is very fluid and very new. Historical movements develop through twists and turns, not in a straight line. The far right has attempted to take over the independent movement before. In 1994, Newt Gingrich crafted the “Contract with America” to woo Perotistas back into the Republican tent. And in 2000, social conservative Pat Buchanan hijacked the Reform Party presidential nomination, though he was roundly repudiated by independents in the general election.

If Republicans are increasing their influence among independents, it’s also because the Democratic Party Left has not been a friend to the independent movement. Sure, Democrats were happy that indies broke for Obama. But they were disappointed that we didn’t become Democrats. They equate progressivism with being in the Democratic Party. But they’re wrong.

Neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party has been enthusiastic about the development of indies as a third force. For different reasons, surely. But they share a common goal: to maintain the primacy of two-value logic (where there is only one or the other, never neither) and make sure independents are passive companions. That’s one reason that the fight for open primaries – which allow independents to cast ballots in every round of voting – and the campaign to appoint independents to the Federal Election Commission are so important. Those fights are about our right to participate and our right to represent our interests in changing the political culture.

The independent movement went left in 2008, after many years of grassroots organizing to link it to progressive leadership. Now the right wants to peel it back. Obama, presumably, wants to hold on to the partnership, but must also privilege his own party, which turns independents off and makes them more susceptible to Republican attacks. Meanwhile, independents are working hard at the grassroots to hold our own.

Jackie Salit is the president of IndependentVoting.org and the campaign coordinator for Mike Bloomberg’s mayoral campaign on the Independence Party line.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Black teens must take the lead to end Black violence

What can we do about the youth violence that took the life of Derrion Albert?

President Obama sent Attorney General Eric Holder and Education Secretary Arne Duncan to Chicago to meet with local officials about curbing Chicago's youth violence. The high rates of violence are embarrassing to the city, the president and the country. Some speculate that Chicago's violence cost it the Olympics, which would be an unfair criticism considering the crime rates in Rio where the 2016 Olympics will be held.

Still, the violent crime, disproportionately affecting Black youth must stop. It is bad enough Rush Limbaugh loves to point out the Black-on-Black nature of violent crime. If that does not shame Blacks into action, I do not know what will.

Read the rest at The Loop.