tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21083673.post875459769436047400..comments2008-03-11T09:19:45.451-07:00The Angry Independenthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07872444863142531165Websteru2006@yahoo.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21083673.post-62633747608571402422008-03-11T09:19:45.451-07:002008-03-11T09:19:45.451-07:00Senator Sociopath<BR/><BR/><BR/>There is no way to categorize her as anything but a sociopath as she perfectly fits the profile. A sociopath is defined as a person with a sense of entitlement who is unremorseful and apathetic to others, takes no personal responsibility and is manipulative and conning. They tend to be affectively cold and socially irresponsible, non-conforming to norms and are often grandiose. <BR/><BR/>Why would Obama need her? She lacks any relevant experience and the baggage she brings would be too burdensome.james d granatahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18219719868190675064noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21083673.post-27578639667227220622008-03-10T03:46:09.974-07:002008-03-10T03:46:09.974-07:00Thank you Rikyrah!<BR/><BR/>Do you see what they are doing in Mississippi? They are trying to trick folks into voting for Hillary...because she would pick Obama as her running mate...(therefore you would still get your guy Obama if you pick Hillary... that's according to Slick Willy).<BR/><BR/>I have never seen this kind of arrogance. Obama (who is leading in delegates....and according to my math will get to 2025 before she will) should somehow take a back seat to Hillary???????<BR/><BR/>The Running mate talk seems to be designed to siphon off votes from Obama.The Angry Independenthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07872444863142531165noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21083673.post-90260870625937613692008-03-10T03:39:33.443-07:002008-03-10T03:39:33.443-07:00A.F.,<BR/><BR/>Kerry could <B>possibly</B> make a good choice, however, he is damaged goods. He may also be too vulnerable in a General Election because of his anti-war stance, both now....and 35 years ago. But he is definitely qualified. The man is Super-qualified. He should have gotten the nod in 04. He won 3debates and still lost the election (because he didn't have the media). It shows the advantage when you have the media on your side (as Bush did).... with Conservatives controlling TV punditry, AM Talk radio, and with the Religious Right staking ownership of Jesus Christ....and controlling religious thought (by controlling the moral/religious debate). Now Clinton is the one who has the media on her side...but hopefully it won't be enough to win her the nomination. Even the Conservative media seems to prefer her over Obama...because she would rally the Republican Party.<BR/><BR/>Gore? He wouldn't make a good choice (the world has changed too much since he was VP)... also, I don't think he wants the job.<BR/><BR/>Furthermore, it would be hard for Obama to argue on one hand for change...removing the same cast of characters, and turning the page, while at the same time, picking Clinton's VP- essentially taking a step back IMO.<BR/><BR/>I will post a list of possible Obama running mates today (if I have the time). Of course he will probably choose someone out of the blue or someone who won't help him win the general election. <BR/>Conventional Wisdom has been on shaky ground so far in this election season. (although I wouldn't call my VP line-up conventional...some would be fairly "out of the box" choices).The Angry Independenthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07872444863142531165noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21083673.post-52116186928170978272008-03-09T09:24:31.242-07:002008-03-09T09:24:31.242-07:00I agree, A.I. HRC does appear to be the most polarizing figure in politics. I wonder how John Kerry would fare as Obama's running mate? He has the military experience and now everybody understands what "swiftboating" is. But he voted for the war. I wonder if Al Gore would consider it. Probably not.A.F.http://www.blogger.com/profile/09945226931776965275noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21083673.post-50019536225838753172008-03-08T06:46:17.860-08:002008-03-08T06:46:17.860-08:00Let's keep voting instead of arguing or speculating. Instant, anonymous voting on all important cabinet posts: http://puredem.wordpress.comPhilhttp://puredem.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21083673.post-49924945028436601562008-03-08T04:05:48.322-08:002008-03-08T04:05:48.322-08:00Great article! I agree 100% she has done to much damaged. She has lost all creditability with me. He don't even need to think about her as a running mate. I think maybe Edwards.jjbrockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10273380949544392923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21083673.post-56464602604942120392008-03-07T13:04:49.812-08:002008-03-07T13:04:49.812-08:00I will not vote for Hillary Clinton if she gets the Democratic nomination for President, and I don't give a damn who her VP is!Admiral Komackhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13671698772150420737noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21083673.post-85696192920343937952008-03-07T09:45:01.535-08:002008-03-07T09:45:01.535-08:00Fist in Air, AI!!<BR/><BR/>Fist in Air<BR/><BR/>I agree with every single wordrikyrahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10982657053583534299noreply@blogger.com